<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About This Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newurbanstreets.com/welcome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newurbanstreets.com</link>
	<description>Sharring experiences in urban infrastructure delivery.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:27:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Davis</title>
		<link>http://newurbanstreets.com/welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newurbanstreets.com/?page_id=21#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Martha - I added a post about storing old brick that may interest you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martha &#8211; I added a post about storing old brick that may interest you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Davis</title>
		<link>http://newurbanstreets.com/welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newurbanstreets.com/?page_id=21#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Martha - I wish we had a spec for reuse of old brick that addresses the issues we encountered. I wrote this article to share ideas with others that want to reuse the old bricks but must write their own spec. The issue is that the standard spec for placing modern brick pavers does not address issues with bricks made 100+ years ago. The architect that says not to worry that &quot;they will not accept it until it is right&quot; is gambling with your money they can bluff their way into getting a good job. If it is spec&#039;ed and detailed correctly there is no need to for the stand-off.

I will be glad to review your consultant&#039;s draft and offer my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martha &#8211; I wish we had a spec for reuse of old brick that addresses the issues we encountered. I wrote this article to share ideas with others that want to reuse the old bricks but must write their own spec. The issue is that the standard spec for placing modern brick pavers does not address issues with bricks made 100+ years ago. The architect that says not to worry that &#8220;they will not accept it until it is right&#8221; is gambling with your money they can bluff their way into getting a good job. If it is spec&#8217;ed and detailed correctly there is no need to for the stand-off.</p>
<p>I will be glad to review your consultant&#8217;s draft and offer my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha Graham</title>
		<link>http://newurbanstreets.com/welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newurbanstreets.com/?page_id=21#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I appreciate what you&#039;ve done here with this blog.  I was searching for a recycle brick paver spec and saw your article, it will be helpful to us, we will be reconstructing the oldest street in our City and need specifications. If you are still associated with the City, possibly they could share it with us.
Martha; St. Augustine, Florida</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate what you&#8217;ve done here with this blog.  I was searching for a recycle brick paver spec and saw your article, it will be helpful to us, we will be reconstructing the oldest street in our City and need specifications. If you are still associated with the City, possibly they could share it with us.<br />
Martha; St. Augustine, Florida</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

